WebChintaman Rao another - Petitioners Versus The State of M.P. - Opposite Party. Petitions Nos. 78 & 79 of 1950. Advocates appeared Shri G. N. Joshi, Advocate, instructed by Shri … WebDec 16, 2024 · M. P. V. Sundararamaier v. State of A.P. (1958) – a law if it lacks legislative competence was absolutely null and void and a subsequent cession of the legislative topic would not revive the law which was still-born and the law would have to be re-enacted; but a law within the legislative competence but violative of constitutional limitation ...
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
WebChintaman Rao Dhivruji Gautam (born 18 October 1899) was the first member of parliament from Balaghat constituency of Madhya Pradesh, India. He was a member of the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th Indian parliaments. He was a member of the Indian National Congress political party.. He was a lawyer by profession. The case is pertaining to the manufacture of bidis and interlink with the fundamental right to trade. Here it is pertinent to note that there was no query of res extra commerciumbut the improper regulation by the state government. The Act has given the authority wide power to issue orders and ultimately gives the … See more §3 & 4 of the impugned Act grants power to the Deputy Commissioner to fix the period as the agricultural season with respect to certain villages where the Act applies. The Deputy … See more Whether the total prohibition of carrying on the business of manufacture of bidis within the agricultural season amounts to a reasonable restriction on the fundamental rights mentioned in … See more new pension credit rates 2023
Chintaman Rao and Ors. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
WebDharangadhara Chemical Works Ltd. v. State of Saurashtra, [1957] S.C.R. 152, applied. Shri Chintaman Rao & ANR Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [1958] INSC 10 (18 … WebMar 13, 2024 · In the case of Chintamanrao v. State of Madhya Pradesh, the constitutionality of an act called Madhya Pradesh Act was challenged which gave the … Webchintamanrao vs. state of madhya pradesh - supreme court of india - november 08, 1950. chintamanrao vs. state of madhya pradesh. laws(sc)-1950-11-1 supreme court of india. decided on november 08,1950 ... state of haryana [laws(p&h)-2024-1-189] [referred to] krishna rice mills tadepalligudem vs. new pension application